The Vatican wrote two books against the new age. One on view of logic, intuition, and theological differences: "Jesus Christ the bearer of the Water of life" The other on the clear differences between Christian and Eastern meditation: "Some aspects of Christian meditation"
Obviously the Vatican documents are much more in line with Church Fathers and even the fathers Weor claims were gnostic, a position which is such a horrible logical position it's laughable anyways, but my question is why believe in this Gnostic teaching when weor died of cancer and is extremely obscure, but there is actual Christian martyrs who were so filled with Christ as to be physically persecuted to death, who would completely disagree with this site? Why take Samael's position as any kind of authority in life, religion, prayer, meditation, theology, philosophy, when it can only be based on his personal claim of his unity with Christ? Logically it makes no sense to me how anyone can believe this. Bashing logic doesn't answer my question. Gnosis presupposes logic, because if the world can be known internally, externally, wherever it has to be rational. Experience itself is a rational estimation. We can't scientifically prove we experience anything at all, but it's logical to believe we are and have. In other worlds I don't know I'm writing this right now, but I believe I am. And even if I believe I know, that belief rests on reason.
Maybe logic has ruined me, because I take it as the foundation of every meaningful observation of the universe ever since I really started learning the Western philosophical tradition, which even Arab philosophy is based on, and I've never even heard of independent eastern philosophy at least not effecting their religions since admittedly Christianity and Islam appear to be logical since a formal logic never existed for the older religions to cope with including Judaism, but as great as Arabic philosophy is, which is mandatory in the Catholic Seminary I attended, it really can't compare in scope to the Catholic Intellectual tradition. Nothing is more logical to someone interested in logic, or to someone who believes the world can follow a logical pattern, but if you deny this, what can be known, since everything would be unstable if it can't be grasped reasonably?
Affective meditation of filling the heart with Christ. Discursive meditation of filling the mind with God. Contemplative meditation of God lifting the soul into ecstasy and lowering it into desolation. Lectio Divina or holy reading of the bible intertwined with the former meditations, but there nothing is nothing about emptiness or void ambiguities to be found in the pre 20th century of Christian meditation.
I could go on but I doubt you reply much except an article of Samael and expect me to believe it as gospel truth. It might be a good idea to put a disclaimer on your get help forum that it'll only help those who already believe in Samael's spiritual authority. Just saying.