Thank you for providing this information for free on your website. And for taking the time to answer our questions.
My question is regarding the difference between law of philosophical analogies and law of correspondence as it relates to dream interpretation. I am having trouble distinguishing between the two as they are described in this lecture https://glorian.org/learn/courses-and-lectures/astral-projection-and-dream-yoga/dream-yoga-course-03-analyzing-experiences
They both sound like they're describing the same type of thing, like analogies and correspondence can be used interchangeably to describe the same thing (X represents Y).
The only distinction (or guess) I can make from these two examples is analogies involves some entity or noun. And correspondence involves an action, effect, or verb. And Analogies seems to only have one meaning (dove = Holy Spirit), where as correspondences could have multiple meanings (rain = tears or pain or karma).
Also, the example for analogies mentions 'symbols', which I heard Carl Jung make the distinction that symbols is a special term. So I'm not sure that has any significance to the definition for Law of Philosophical Analogies.
Could you help me sort this out please? What is the difference between Law of Philosophical Analogies and Law of Correspondences?
Thank you.
My question is regarding the difference between law of philosophical analogies and law of correspondence as it relates to dream interpretation. I am having trouble distinguishing between the two as they are described in this lecture https://glorian.org/learn/courses-and-lectures/astral-projection-and-dream-yoga/dream-yoga-course-03-analyzing-experiences
An example of the Philosophical Analogies: remember that the white dove and eagle are the symbols of the Holy Spirit. Any type of bird is related with the analogy of the Spirit.
An example of the Correspondences: rain is related with tears, pain, karma, and yet it also depends on how we are experiencing such dreams.
They both sound like they're describing the same type of thing, like analogies and correspondence can be used interchangeably to describe the same thing (X represents Y).
The only distinction (or guess) I can make from these two examples is analogies involves some entity or noun. And correspondence involves an action, effect, or verb. And Analogies seems to only have one meaning (dove = Holy Spirit), where as correspondences could have multiple meanings (rain = tears or pain or karma).
Also, the example for analogies mentions 'symbols', which I heard Carl Jung make the distinction that symbols is a special term. So I'm not sure that has any significance to the definition for Law of Philosophical Analogies.
Could you help me sort this out please? What is the difference between Law of Philosophical Analogies and Law of Correspondences?
Thank you.