The Being does not associate, it does compare or use relativism, it does analyze or have doubt. The Being speaks laconically, and its silence is verbose - it is, it has been, it will always be, the Being.
I was reading that book and wondered about this statement, whether its correct in how its written, that the Being compares, doubts etc? Its on page 322.
The Being does not associate, it does not compare or use relativism, it does not analyze or have doubt. The Being speaks laconically, and its silence is verbose - it is, it has been, it will always be, the Being.
That was an unfortunate typo, now fixed above. Thank you!
The Being does not associate, it does not compare or use relativism, it does not analyze or have doubt. The Being speaks laconically, and its silence is verbose - it is, it has been, it will always be, the Being.
That was an unfortunate typo, now fixed above. Thank you!
You will need to be logged in to be able to post a reply. Login using the form on the right or register an account if you are new here. Register Here »