By Hunor on Monday, 22 June 2020
Replies 3
Likes 0
Views 537
Votes 0
Dear Instructors,

I wonder if there is any difference between the "existential bodies of the Being" and the "superior existential bodies of the Being".
In The Revolution of the Dialectic - The Revolution of Meditation V.M Samael uses both phrases. Because of the context, I interpret them to be the same, but I might be wrong, considering that there are bodies of fire and of gold. I would be thankful for a clarification.


  • The Subud school of black magic states that the Monad or the Great Reality will penetrate within him who does not possess the existential bodies of the Being. This is a false statement.


  • The only thing that the intellectual animal can do (being unable to incarnate the Being due to the fact that he still does not possess the superior existential bodies) is to practice meditation, to self-awaken the Buddhadatu and to know the truth.



Thank you!
There is no difference between superior existential bodies of the Being and the existential bodies of the Being.
·
3 years ago
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
There are lunar bodies made by mechanical nature, and there are solar bodies made by conscious will. The solar bodies have degrees of development. When first made (by fire), they are not yet perfect (gold), so must be perfected.

The use of the word superior simply indicates that the solar bodies are of greater quality than the lunar bodies.
·
3 years ago
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
Alexis, thank you for your answer.
Please, let me rephrase my question.

Is there a difference between "the existential bodies of the Being" and "the superior existential bodies of the Being" in the context of that chapter?

Thank you!
·
3 years ago
·
0 Likes
·
0 Votes
·
0 Comments
·
View Full Post