Wednesday, 19 June 2019
  1 Replies
  554 Visits
Dear teacher,

I would like to know why we all are not be honest about the fact that we do not know. I mean whatever we say or suggest is from the point of reference, isn't it similar to holding a belief. Whatever the truth we state is from the point of master samael reference, it may be true but if it is not in ones experience why bother to tell, i feel a sense of guilt to even share the idea of hell and heaven or anything that i read in the books, i feel i have answer to all the problems of humanity but in actuality i dont know. I do practices given by master samael aun weor and do meditation, i've had many experiences in astral world. But only when i am free from the authority of someone telling me what to do. I have seen gnostic working so hard with themselves and become so dull put gnosis in everything and cant live with simplicity.

I feel freedom and love go together to unveil the creative happiness in oneself and in other, it has to followed silently and in secrecy but people talking all the time about these things as if they know everything and slowly feeding their pride.

What do you think sirs, is it good to know everything from book without knowing anything at all
4 years ago
·
#18893
Accepted Answer
The balance of knowledge and being leads to comprehension. You need both.

However, going around quoting other people's words, acting that one knows from experience, is knowledge above being. This is a swindler, someone who cheats others and oneself, since one pretends to be something one isn't.

Not knowing the literature while having lots of internal experiences creates problems, because one does not know how to interpret the wisdom of God. This is the serious case of a stupid saint.

One must be informed, but not fanatic.

One must be disciplined, but not a simpleton.

People who do not work with both knowledge and being in harmony create difficult situations for themselves and others.

There is nothing wrong with introducing these writings to others even when one does not know certain parts from experience.

I recommend that you speak about things you are confident about, that you have verified, while offering the rest of the knowledge with the understanding that this is what you study and are interested in. This helps yourself and humanity at the same time.

For thirty years I sought God. But when I looked carefully I found that in reality God was the seeker and I the sought. -Bayazid al-Bastami

4 years ago
·
#18893
Accepted Answer
The balance of knowledge and being leads to comprehension. You need both.

However, going around quoting other people's words, acting that one knows from experience, is knowledge above being. This is a swindler, someone who cheats others and oneself, since one pretends to be something one isn't.

Not knowing the literature while having lots of internal experiences creates problems, because one does not know how to interpret the wisdom of God. This is the serious case of a stupid saint.

One must be informed, but not fanatic.

One must be disciplined, but not a simpleton.

People who do not work with both knowledge and being in harmony create difficult situations for themselves and others.

There is nothing wrong with introducing these writings to others even when one does not know certain parts from experience.

I recommend that you speak about things you are confident about, that you have verified, while offering the rest of the knowledge with the understanding that this is what you study and are interested in. This helps yourself and humanity at the same time.

For thirty years I sought God. But when I looked carefully I found that in reality God was the seeker and I the sought. -Bayazid al-Bastami

There are no replies made for this post yet.