Thank you for the response and explanations. But, there appear to be some discrepancies that are still unresolved. First, regarding the practice of pranayama H.P. Blavatsky and the Masters have quite different views on the matter than Samael Aun Weor has. For example-
"Now, the science of Ha˜ha-Yoga rests upon the “suppression of breath,” or Prânâyâma, to which exercise our Masters, are unanimously opposed. For what is Prânâyâma? Literally translated, it means the “death of (vital) breath.” Prâna, as said, is not Jîva, the eternal fount of life immortal, nor is it connected in any way with Pranava, as some think, for Pranava is a synonym of AUM in a mystic sense. All that has ever been taught publicly and clearly about it is to be found in “Nature’s Finer Forces.” If such directions, however, are followed, they can only lead to black magic and mediumship. Several impatient Chelas, whom we knew personally in India, went in for the practice of Ha˜ha-Yoga, notwithstanding our warnings. Of these, two developed consumption, of which one died; the others became almost idiotic; another committed suicide; and one developed into a regular Tântrika, a black magician, but his career, fortunately for himself, was cut short by death.
The science of the five breaths––the moist, the fiery, the airy, etc., etc.––has a twofold significance and two applications. By the Tântrikas it is accepted literally, as relating to the regulation of the vital, lung breath, but by the ancient Râja-Yogis as referring to the mental or “will” breath, which alone leads to the highest clairvoyant powers, to the function of the Third Eye and the acquisition of the true Râja-Yoga occult powers. The difference between the two is enormous."
Blavatsky collected writings vol. 12
And
Master K.H. wrote that A. O. Hume had, "by the injudicious practice of pranayam, developed in himself to some extent mediumship — is tainted for life with it".
So, the question is why did Samael teach pranayama( the suppression of the vital breath not the Will breath of the Raja Yogis) if it could lead to mediumship?
Second, Blavatsky taught the Aquarian Age began in 1900. Not 1950 as Samael taught. And that there was the intersection of three very rare and important cycles in the last quarter of the 19th century. Quoting from the website Blavatsky Theosophy Group UK-
“The closing quarter of the 19th century was an extremely important and crucial period in humanity’s history and evolution. Three great cycles all intersected at the same time, a very rare and uncommon occurrence. The first 5,000 year cycle of the Kali Yuga was due to draw to a close between late 1897 and early 1898. The Age of Pisces was rapidly fading out and the New Age of Aquarius was to gradually begin its 2,155 year course from the dawning of the new century in 1900.
“In 14th century Tibet, Tsong Kha-pa – the reincarnation of Gautama Buddha – had ordained that the Esoteric Brotherhood was henceforth to send one of their own to the Western world in the closing quarter of each century, to help bring about further spiritual awakening and enlightenment. It was known and understood that only a particular 25 years in each century could be actively used for this purpose, such were and are the very real restrictions of Cyclic and Karmic Law."
“It was made clear that the cycle of open communications and new teachings from Masters would close in 1900 (the year HPB said the Aquarian Age was due to begin) and not re-open until 1975, lasting from 1975-2000 as you point out. This was presented as provisional, however, and dependent upon how well Theosophists would do their job and fulfill their appointed task. All that was required was 75 years of faithful work and earnest commitment to the lines clearly laid down by the Masters and HPB…but I’m sure you know as well as I do how many people long for “the latest teachings” and “fresh revelations” from “the Masters” and especially when they haven’t even bothered to properly study, assimilate, and apply those which have already been given out."
Here is H.P. Blavatsky's statements.
“I must tell you that during the last quarter of every hundred years an attempt is made by those “Masters,” of whom I have spoken, to help on the spiritual progress of Humanity in a marked and definite way. Towards the close of each century you will invariably find that an outpouring or upheaval of spirituality – or call it mysticism if you prefer – has taken place. Some one or more persons have appeared in the world as their agents, and a greater or less amount of occult knowledge and teaching has been given out. If you care to do so, you can trace these movements back, century by century, as far as our detailed historical records extend. … If the present attempt, in the form of our Society, succeeds better than its predecessors have done, then it will be in existence as an organized, living and healthy body when the time comes for the effort of the 20th century.”
– H.P. Blavatsky, “The Key to Theosophy” p. 306-307
No Master of Wisdom from the East will himself appear or send any one to Europe or America after that period, and the sluggards will have to renounce every chance of advancement in their present incarnation––until the year 1975. Such is the LAW, for we are in Kali Yuga––the Black Age––and the restrictions in this cycle, the first 5,000 years of which will expire in 1897, are great and almost insuperable.
from the PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM TO THE ESOTERIC SECTION.
And this from W.Q. Judge co-founder of the Theosophical Society, an accepted chela of thirteen years standing with the Masters, and whom Blavatsky called her only friend.
“Nothing is more plain than that H.P. Blavatsky said, on the direct authority of the Masters, that in the last twenty-five years of each century an effort is made by the Lodge and its agents with the West, and that it [i.e. the effort] ceases in its direct and public form and influence with the twenty-fifth year. Those who believe her will believe this; those who think they know more about it than she did will invent other ideas suited to their fancies."
from his article THE CLOSING CYCLE.
Where does Samael Aun Weor fit in to this? He began teaching in 1950 a full 25 years before 1975.
Third, is the question of C.W. Leadbeater. Most of us probably know about the accusations made against him, that he was teaching the boys in his care masturbation. I thought the same thing, that they were just accusations until I encountered the historical facts. Quoting from the same website sited previously-
"The fact that Leadbeater admitted under oath in 1906 to having performed sexual acts on young boys in his care on numerous occasions and often in ongoing circumstances. This confession, which he made after complaints and allegations from several boys, quite rightly resulted in his being forced out of the Theosophical Society in shame and disgrace, only to later be invited back and readmitted by Annie Besant, much to the disgust of many other Theosophists."
" The fact that he was secretly a member of a sexual magic group in Australia during the latter part of his life when he lived there, having been introduced to the group by James Wedgwood, his fellow co-founding “Bishop” of the Liberal Catholic Church, whose disgraceful and sickening antics and abuse of young boys are not worth repeating"
" The fact that he inculcated a secret teaching and practice amongst specially selected members of the Society, which was referred to as “the X. teaching,” where the select few were instructed to regularly practice masturbation whilst focussing their minds and imagination upon the “Solar Logos” and that he also taught and personally practiced such things with groups of boy pupils, who were also sworn to secrecy, although one or two of them later revealed and confessed the facts, after Leadbeater had died."
"The fact that he was frequently under investigation by the police and considered by them “a person of interest” due to both rumours and accusations of paedophilia which unfailingly arose wherever he went."
" The fact that he repeatedly fabricated stories of meetings with Masters, such as the account told with great sincerity and emotion in his book “The Masters and The Path” of having met the Master Morya physically and in person in London in 1851 when he was “four years old” and around the same time that HPB had met the Master there in London. The discovery after Leadbeater’s death that he had actually not been born until 1854 casts this tale in its true and consciously deceptive light. And if this was just a fraudulent fantasy, then why not all the others?"
"The fact that eyewitnesses reported having seen him perform indecent acts upon the young Krishnamurti and that Krishnamurti in later years when asked about Leadbeater would only say “That man was evil.”
"Even in his old age in the 1930s, he was regularly leading secret ritual masturbation circles with his boy pupils in which they were instructed to direct their thoughts to the Solar Logos upon ejaculation! In Black Magic, this is considered to be an easy shortcut to developing spiritual and psychic powers. In reality, such methods and practices are equated by HPB with the “unforgivable sin” and easily lead to the loss of the soul. A female English Theosophist, an admirer of Leadbeater, travelled to Australia in order to meet him in person for the first time and spend time in his company. Upon eventually returning to England, she was particularly shaken and disturbed and kept repeating the words “Leadbeater’s a beast!” When pressed for an explanation, she revealed how some of “Leadbeater’s boys” had confessed to her that he made them drink their own semen, ostensibly on the grounds that it was beneficial for their spiritual development!"
And for those inclined to think that these accusations might have been fabricated so as to ruin his reputation, here is Leadbeater admitting in his own words that he taught masturbation.-
On the 27th of February 1906, Leadbeater wrote a letter to Alex Fullerton, 1
elaborating his beliefs regarding the “advice” he gave:
“I know that the whole question of sex feelings is the principal difficulty in the path of boys and girls, and very much harm is done by the prevalent habit of ignoring the subject and fearing to speak of it to young people … Therefore I always speak of it quite frankly and naturally to those I am trying to help, when they become sufficiently familiar with me to make it possible.” 2
The conventional idea that such thoughts do not much matter so long as they do not issue in overt acts is not only untrue; it is absolutely the reverse of the truth. I have seen literally hundreds of cases of this horrible condition, and have traced the effects which it produces in after-life. … Much of this trouble is due to the perfectly natural pressure of certain physical accumulations, and as the boy grows older this increasing pressure drives him into associations with loose women or sometimes into unnatural crimes. Now all this may be avoided by periodically relieving that pressure, and experience has shown that if the boy provokes at stated intervals a DISCHARGE[capitals mine] which produces that relief, he can comparatively easily rid his mind of such thoughts in the interim, and in that way escape all the more serious consequences."
So, here is Leadbeater saying he taught masturbation as a sort of prophylactic. Not any type of "vajroli mudra."
Regarding his homosexuality-
according to writer James Webb, Leadbeater was a 'homosexual' (The Occult Underground by James Webb, pg 87) and also notes that "From his early days as a Hampshire curate until the close of his life at at Sydney, he seems to have had an incurable taste for young men."(Ibid pg.97). It was Leadbeater who had discovered an 8 year old Krishnamurti on an Indian beach and decided to 'adopt' him. Krishnamurti's father nearly ruined the scheme however, when he accused Leadbeater of 'corrupting' his son.
For those interested in verifying all of this they are refered to Gregory Tillett’s book “The Elder Brother: A Biography of Charles Webster Leadbeater” published sometime in the 1980s as well as Tillett’s over 1,000 page thesis about him online at leadbeater.org.
Was Samael Aun Weor wrong in calling him a great master?
Fourth, is the problem that arises with the assertion that Blavatsky practiced sexual magic with H.S. Olcott, or with anybody for that matter. First, Blavatsky was NEVER married to col. Olcott. Many of Blavatsky's biographers are of the opinion that Blavatsky's relationship with Olcott was strictly platonic. In fact, Olcott would call Blavatsky and himself "the Theosophical Twins" indicating a brother and sister relationship. He said, "she was the Teacher, I the pupil." And while living together in New York during the writing of Isis Unveiled both denied there being any romantic relationship between them. Her first marriage to Count Nikifor Blavatsky lasted only three months, and she left before it was consummated. Her second marriage was with a Georgian Mikheil Betaneli in 1874 which also lasted only a few months, and was for financial reasons only. As Blavatsky refused to consummate the marriage, Betaneli sued for divorce. But most importantly, Blavatsky asserted that she was a life long VIRGIN. As she had many enemies, certain vicious rumours were started, and even her own father was suspicious. A little background on this is that she had adopted a little deformed boy named Yuri, and her enemies claimed it was hers. Blavatsky resented this attack on her character, and wrote to A.P. Sinnett (the recipient of most of the Mahatma Letters) that she had a "congenital crookedness of the uterus" which made sex and conception impossible. Sinnett urged her to get a certificate, and she followed his advice. Dr. Leon Oppenheim wrote after examining her "Madame Blavatsky suffers from Anteflexio Uteri, most probably from the day of her birth; because as proven by minute examination, she has never born any child, nor has she had any gynecological illness. Signed Dr. Leon Oppenheim, Wurzburg, 3 November, 1885. Attested Wilhelm Hubbe Scheidon and Franz Ghebard." A little frustrated after all of this Blavatsky wrote again to A.P. Sinnett
"Here's your stupid certificate with your dreams of virgo intacta in a women who had all her guts out, womb and all, by fall from horseback. And yet the doctor looked, examined three times and says what the Professor Bodkin and Pirogoff said at pskoff in 1862. I could never have had connection with any man, because I am lacking something..."
So, not only did she assert she was a virgin, but it was verified by doctors. How could Samael Aun Weor say she was married to H.S. Olcott and practiced sex magic? How do we reconcile this?
Sincerely, a student of THEOSOPHIA